ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS1. Why have the IMF attracted controversy and how far have they modiefed their policies in reponse? support your answer with a case study. Is it fair to say that the world would be better off without the IMF?2. Evaluate the policy of humanitarian intervention? use case study to support your answer.take a case and analyze it withe the concept of Responsibility to Protect and its effectivenessThe layout:Intro: includes the pros and cons of the intervention theoreticallyBps: should include the explanation of the case and its pros and cons, legitimately, mandate and interventionhttp://fpif.org/the_crisis_of_humanitarian_intervention/http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/rgoodman/pdfs/RGoodmanHumanitarianInterventionPretextsforWar.pdfhttp://www.cfr.org/humanitarian-intervention/dilemma-humanitarian-intervention/p16524http://www.unrol.org/files/SGReportEarlyWarningandAssessmentA64864.pdfhttp://www.un.org/en/ga/president/65/initiatives/Report%20of%20the%20SG%20to%20MS.pdfhttp://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/UNSG%20Report_timely%20and%20decisive%20response(1).pdfhttps://www.globalpolicy.org/humanitarian-intervention.htmli chose the crisis in darfur and here is the link with the reportshttp://responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/crises/crisis-in-darfurMiga, a French company, sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of goods, much of it on credit, to various agencies of the Russian government. The first deals were made with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), then, after the collapse of that government in 1991, with the Federative Socialist Soviet Republic of Russia (RSFSR), the successor government. The agreements called for binding arbitration of any disputes at the Chamber of Commerce of Stockholm, Sweden, under Swiss law, and subject to enforcement in court in New York. Following failure to make payments, the arbitrator awarded Miga $275 million, which Russia refused to pay. Miga brought suit in federal court in New York to enforce the arbitration award.You be the judge. Who wins? Why? Make sure you address all the issues.Miga, a French company, sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of goods, much of it on credit, to various agencies of the Russian government. The first deals were made with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), then, after the collapse of that government in 1991, with the Federative Socialist Soviet Republic of Russia (RSFSR), the successor government. The agreements called for binding arbitration of any disputes at the Chamber of Commerce of Stockholm, Sweden, under Swiss law, and subject to enforcement in court in New York. Following failure to make payments, the arbitrator awarded Miga $275 million, which Russia refused to pay. Miga brought suit in federal court in New York to enforce the arbitration award.You be the judge. Who wins? Why? Make sure you address all the issues.