# Determine the appropriate statistical tool to test the hypothesis based on the research question.

sing the research question and two variables your learning team developed for the Week 2 Business Research Project Part 1 assignment, create a no more than 350-word inferential statistics (hypothesis test). Include:

(a) The research question

(b) Mock data for the independent and dependent variables

Determine the appropriate statistical tool to test the hypothesis based on the research question.

Conduct a hypothesis test with a 95% confidence level, using the statistical tool.

Interpret the results and provide your findings.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Submit both the spreadsheet and the paper.

Submitted by Professor Ryan on Wed, 2015-08-05 05:48

teacher rated 622 times
4.4373
purchased one time
price: \$20.00

body preview (0 words)

file1.docx preview (287 words)

xxxxxxx’x xxxx

x

 xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx PROJECT 1

xx

 xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx x

xxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx Project

Team B has been xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx the relationship xxxxxxx the independent (pain xxxxxxxxxx strategy) xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxx variables.

The xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx derived by Team B “xxxx is a patients’ xxxx xxxxxxxxxx with wounds xxx xxxxx pain management strategies?” will xxxx xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx effectiveness of xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxx wounds. xxx hypothesis derived will be,

(HO) xx the wound xxxx xxxxxx improves their pain xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx will be a xxxxxxxx in xxxx xxxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx

(H1) If xxx xxxxx care center xxxxxxxx xxxxx pain xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx will xx xx xxxxxxxx xx pain xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx with xxxxxx

Establishing the xxxxxxxxxxx level as well xx the corresponding critical xxxxxxxx will be xxx next step in

– – – more text follows – – –

file2.xlsx preview (238 words)

# xxxxxx

xxxxxxx

 2.0 Chi-square distribution xx x 1 xxxxx .0000 3.841 xxxxxxxx P(upper) xxxxxxxxxx

# xxxxxx xx xxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 xxxxxxx Paired Two Sample for Means Variable x xxxxxxxx 2 xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Variance xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Observations 61 xx Pearson Correlation 0.9875134226 Hypothesized xxxx Difference 0 df xx t Stat 330.0478983832 xxx

# xxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx for xxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1 Shift x xxxxx 3 xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxxxx 1000 xxx xxx xxx xxxx pain management xxxxxxx Effect Date xxxx xxxxxxxxxx stategy Effect 2-Jan-13 xxxx 892 576 734 xxxxxxxx 1000 xxx 1-Feb-15 1004 735 xxxxxxxxxxx Statistics xxxx xxxxxxxxxx stategy Effect 3-Jan-13 1030 xxx xxx 749 xxxxxxxx xxxx xxx 2-Feb-15 xxxx xxx xxxxx 61 xx 4-Jan-13 999 883 570 xxx xxxxxxxx xxxx 749 xxxxxxxx 1034 752 xxxx 996 xxx xxxxxxxx 1004 887 xxx 730 4-Jan-15 xxx 726 xxxxxxxx 1011 xxx standard deviation xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx 882 xxx 731 xxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxx 713 xxxxxx variance xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx 890 xxx 733 6-Jan-15 1001 xxx xxxxxxxx xxx xxx minimum xxx xxx 8-Jan-13 xxxx xxx 576 734 xxxxxxxx 1000 xxx 7-Feb-15 xxx 717 maximum xxxx xxx 9-Jan-13 xxxx 910 xxx 749 8-Jan-15 xxxx 734 8-Feb-15 982 719 xxxxx xx xx 10-Jan-13 999 xxx xxx 726 xxxxxxxx 1030 749 9-Feb-15 991 721 xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx 573 xxx 10-Jan-15 xxx xxx 10-Feb-15 1011 xxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxx lower 12-Jan-13 xxxx xxx xxx 731 11-Jan-15 1004 730 11-Feb-15 981 713 confidence level xxx upper xxxxxxxxx 1000 890 xxx 733 12-Jan-15 1001 731 12-Feb-15 986 xxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx 576 xxx xxxxxxxxx 1000 733 xxxxxxxxx 983 xxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx 588 xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx 734 xxxxxxxxx 982 719 16-Jan-13 xxxx xxx 570 xxx 15-Jan-15 1031 xxx 15-Feb-15 xxx xxx xxx

– – – more text follows – – –